Per una normalizzazione dell’ermeneutica degli scritti teilhardiani

Leggere Teilhard senza encomi, senza deprecazioni, senza annessioni (Parte II)

Abstract

After proving in the first part of the article the inadequacy of Teilhard’s designations ranging from “blessed” to “cavendus”, from “prophet” to “mystic” , from “visionary” to “scientist”, in this second part it is argued that the term that best fits the definition of his personality and his works is “thinker”. Very different scholars agree on that designation, such as Grenet, de Lubac, Löwith, Leonardo Boff, Spadaro, Galleni. The article critically discusses the way in which they have configured the identification of Teilhard as a “thinker”; differently from their interpretations a new identification of Teilhard is suggested as more relevant, that of “thinker of the technique”.